Greg Gutfeld: Is it 'predatory' to want to protect women's sports?

 

Democrats Rush to Protect Perpetrators: The Battle Over Women's Sports

The debate over protecting women's sports has taken a bizarre turn, with Democrats rushing to defend policies that allow biological men to compete in women’s sports. A recent bill aiming to ban this practice sparked heated arguments, with opponents citing head-scratching reasons to reject it. According to the left, such a bill would somehow create “more predators.” Let’s break it down.

The Left’s Talking Points 

 Critics of the bill argue that it would lead to invasive examinations of children, creating a situation where, as one Democrat stated, “ nonage bloodsuckers would be unleashed on the children of this country. ” Another opponent called bans like this dangerous to girls and “ invasive and insolvable to apply. ” One indeed indicted Republicans of insincerity, claiming, “ Republicans who suggested against the Violence Against Women Act now want to pretend moment that they watch about women. ” 

 But this logic falls piecemeal under scrutiny. Nowhere in the bill does it state that girls or women would be subordinated to invasive examinations. So why bring up such an absurd point? As the discussion highlights, these arguments feel designed to redirect attention from the core issue guarding women’s safe spaces and icing fair competition in sports. 

The Hypocrisy of "Invasiveness"

It’s ironic to hear opponents of the bill describe it as invasive while ignoring the real invasion: men entering women’s spaces. The left’s logic seems to imply that protecting women would somehow lead to harm, a claim that’s not only unfounded but also insulting to the very people they claim to support.

As pointed out in the discussion, “If you're worried about inspections, what does that say about your faith in the system you're defending?” The reality is that these arguments distract from the core issue—fairness and safety for women in sports and other spaces.

Predators Already in the System

One panelist noted the irony of the opposition’s argument: “They said they would release the predators on the kids. Well, you already did that when you gave men the ability to claim to be a woman to go into a bathroom.” This sentiment captures the frustration many feel about policies that prioritize inclusivity at the expense of safety and fairness.

Cultural Shifts From Forbearance to Countersign 

 Another crucial point raised was the artistic shift over the once many decades. “ Growing up, the words we heard were forbearance. Right now, what’s passing in the culture is the failure to plump is called being a hater. ” This mandatory belief system leaves no room for discussion or disagreement.However, they're incontinently labeled as spiteful, If someone raises enterprises about fairness or safety. 

 One panelist participated a particular story about a friend whose child contended against a transgender swoon. The friend was labeled a “ hater ” simply for questioning the fairness of the situation. “ Does that mean he’s a hater, or is he simply failing to plump commodity because he has questions about it? ” 

Sports and Fairness: The Real Issue

The impact on sports is undeniable. Stories like that of swimmer Lia Thomas, who ranked 72nd in men’s competitions before transitioning and dominating women’s events, highlight the glaring inequities. As one panelist stated, “Not because he was inside fighting to be a girl. He had the same problem men have. He had an ego problem and found a loophole.”

The discussion also emphasized how men and women approach spaces like locker rooms differently. “We don’t care who comes into our locker room. We’re there to get in and out. There’s no conversation.” But for women, the presence of biological men in these spaces raises legitimate concerns.

Conclusion

The left’s reasoning for opposing this bill doesn’t hold water. Their claims of invasiveness and harm are baseless and distract from the real issues of fairness and safety. Policies allowing biological men to compete in women’s sports or enter women’s spaces undermine decades of progress and create an uneven playing field.

The cultural shift from tolerance to compulsory endorsement has stifled meaningful conversation. But as more people raise these concerns, it’s becoming clear that the real problem isn’t the bill—it’s the refusal to address the legitimate concerns of women and girls. It’s time to prioritize fairness, safety, and common sense in these debates.